Do you charge a retainer fee or require an advance payment in some cases?
If so, a brand-new ABA ethics opinion should be mandatory reading.
ABA Formal Opinion 505, handed down in early May, addresses the professional and ethical obligations that arise when a client pays in advance for legal work to be performed in the future.
“Formal Opinion 505 points to the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct and applications of model rules related to fees and safekeeping of others’ property to explain how lawyers should handle advance fees paid by individual clients, usually for a single legal matter that will not recur on a regular basis,” says the ABA in this press release. “These matters could include divorce, defense of criminal charges or civil matters not handled on a contingent fee basis.”
One industry observer suggests the opinion could be an ethical minefield, especially for law firms that use a pay-in-advance subscription legal services model.
As a general rule of thumb, ethics authorities disfavor nonrefundable fees.
New and more insidious cyber threats to your law practice are emerging daily. Cloud data storage heightens the risk, as does working remotely, or even using email. Meanwhile, lawyers have an ethical duty to be technologically competent. Can you meet that standard? Plan to attend our upcoming live one-hour CLE webinar Law Firm Cyberthreat Landscape 2023 Mid-Year Report and get up to speed. Join us online June 27, 12 Noon CST. Discover the Top Cyber Threats and the Emerging Risks. Hear from an Expert Ransomware Negotiator. Find out how Zero-Trust Cybersecurity can protect your practice; Learn about the ABA’s First-Ever Guidelines for AI Usage; See actual data breach case studies; Come away with best practices for your law firm. It’s Free CLE! See you on June 27.
True Retainer vs. Advance Fee
ABA Formal Opinion 505 says true retainers are rare and unusual.
“[A] retainer is often conflated with an advance fee,” says the ABA. “The former should not be construed as a ‘payment for the performance of services, but rather is compensation for the lawyer’s promise of availability … (and) is not an advance deposit against future legal services.’”
A “true” retainer fee – sometimes called a general retainer or availability retainer – is an advance payment deemed fully earned on acceptance, say, the first of each month. These days, true retainers are relics from a bygone era. Few clients are willing to pay for the privilege of being able to call on their lawyer – and be billed further – that month.
Three hypothetical divorce cases are used in ABA Formal Opinion 505 to examine when a lawyer might tell a client that the prepaid fee was nonrefundable. In most cases, the opinion suggests, doing so would violate the model rules.
“We offer the following suggestions in relation to the matters addressed in this opinion. Use plain language,” it said. “Thus, instead of ‘retainer’ say ‘advance’ and explain that it is a ‘deposit for fees.’ Explain that the sum deposited will be applied to the balance owed for work on the matter, and how and when this will happen.”
Read the full text of ABA Formal Opinion 505 here.
Do you know one simple step that will reduce your risk of wire fraud to near zero? Can you name the Three C’s of Law Firm Branding? Do you understand how amygdala hijack might be sabotaging your law practice? You would know the answers to these and other important questions if you attended our recent CLE webinars. These free lunch-hour programs – which feature nationally-recognized experts offering practical tips and guidance on crucial issues affecting the legal industry – are just one of the many benefits available to you as a member of the Alta Pro Risk Purchasing Group (RPG). You may be eligible for regular Pro Practice e-Alerts, the Pro Practice Blog, Reminger Law’s ProLink risk hotline, discounts on CLIO practice management software, free consultations with the Risk Pro and more – without even knowing it. Register here and start enjoying your Alta Pro RPG benefits.