Ohio lawyers who practice personal injury, insurance or criminal law should be aware of a recent ruling by that state’s Supreme Court that affects all three areas. Below is a case analysis from Reminger Law.
[Editor’s note: members of the Alta Pro Lawyers Risk Purchasing Group can receive claim prevention and risk management assistance from the lawyer liability team at Reminger.]
Post by Brianna Prislipsky
(with permission)
“On July 12, 2023, the Ohio Supreme Court held by way of a 7-0 consensus that an assault and battery exclusion in an insurance policy could not be nullified based upon the mental state of the individual who committed the underlying assault, even when the individual who committed the assault could not be criminally convicted. Krewina v. United Specialty Insurance Co., Slip Opinion No. 2023-Ohio-2343.
The plaintiff, Austin Krewina, was a resident at the Brown County Care Center when another resident, Colin Doherty, attacked him with a knife, causing bodily injury. Doherty, a disabled individual, was charged with felonious assault by the state of Ohio but was found not guilty by reason of insanity. The Care Center was insured through United Specialty Insurance Company (“USIC”) with a policy that expressly excluded coverage for bodily injury which arose out of “any actual, threatened or alleged assault or battery.”
Neither assault nor battery were defined terms under the policy.
Krewina brought suit against the Care Center, and the parties settled the matter pursuant to an agreement under which the Center consented to a final judgment in favor of Krewina. Krewina subsequently brought a declaratory judgment action against USIC to collect on the judgment, alleging that the policy exclusion did not apply to the assault he experienced, as Doherty was found not guilty of felonious assault by reason of insanity.“
Do you have a Law Firm Compensation Plan? Without one, you’re hampering the success of your practice. An effective and equitable pay structure will increase firm productivity, reduce turnover and boost office morale. It will help you recruit and retain the highest caliber of legal talent. And it will allow you to provide consistently excellent client service. Join us on September 27 for the CLE webinar, Creating an Attorney Compensation Plan That Will Build Firm Culture and Attract Top Talent, and learn how to design and develop a compensation plan that’s right for your practice – whether you’re building one from scratch or updating an existing plan. This free, one-hour CLE will be taught by two of the country’s top authorities on law firm economics, Brenda A. Barnes and Camille Stell, co-authors of the book RESPECT: An Insight to Attorney Compensation. Don’t miss this latest installment in Alta Pro’s highly popular, cutting-edge CLE webinar series. Register now!
Krewina v. United Specialty Insurance Co
“The case proceeded to a bench trial before the trial court. Krewina relied primarily on the criminal definition of assault, which requires subjective intent. Because Doherty did not have that requisite intent, Krewina argued that the assault exclusion could not apply. The trial court disagreed and granted summary judgment in favor of USIC. The First District reversed on appeal, finding that Doherty could not have assaulted Krewina because Doherty lacked the capacity to govern his conduct and thus could not act intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly.
On appeal, the Supreme Court reversed the appellate court, finding that the common law definition of assault controlled, meaning that Doherty’s actions constituted assault under the policy regardless of whether he possessed the requisite intent. Because Doherty’s actions constituted assault under common law, the Court held that the policy exclusion applied, and USIC could not be liable under the policy.
The Court went on to note that, while Krewina’s injuries were unfortunate, it was not the Court’s sympathies, but the language of the policy which carries weight. The Court concluded with an admonishment that courts must refrain from “inserting exceptions into contracts where they do not exist.”
This case reaffirms the Ohio Supreme Court’s commitment to plain language policy interpretation based upon the ordinary and common law meaning of terms, as opposed to their legal and/or statutory equivalents. When a term or phrase has an accepted, every day meaning, it is that common term that should guide the interpretation of contracts.“
If you have any questions regarding the potential impact of this decision or any other question about Insurance Coverage, please contact one of Reminger’s Insurance Coverage Practice Group attorneys.
About the Author
Brianna is an associate attorney in Reminger Co. LPA’s Cleveland office. She focuses her practice on appellate advocacy, insurance coverage, professional liability, and employment law. Brianna first joined the firm as a law clerk in Reminger’s Youngstown office, where she gained valuable experience in all aspects of litigation, including complex brief writing.
Alta Pro RPG now offers Lawyers Professional Liability Insurance in 15 states. Do you practice in Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas or Wisconsin? If so, you may be eligible for membership in the Alta Pro Lawyers Risk Purchasing Group (RPG), which offers a wealth of benefits for your practice: free, cutting-edge CLE webinars featuring top experts tackling timely topics; the Pro Practice Playbook; the Pro Practice Blog; Reminger’s ProLink risk management assistance; Reminger’s Claim Repair Hotline; discounts on CLIO practice management software; tax savings on health insurance; and access to the Risk Pro, to keep your firm safe and successful. Alta Pro RPG – helping lawyers in 15 states stay safe and successful. Click here to learn more about Alta Pro RPG benefits.
