14141 Farmington Rd, Livonia, MI 48154

Indiana Court Expands “Apparent Agency” Doctrine

A caselaw update from Reminger Attorneys at Law.

Guest article by Trenton Gill and Autumn Seib,
Reminger Attorneys at Law

Today it is common for hospitals to retain medical providers who are independent contractors. Indiana courts have long followed the general rule that hospitals cannot be held liable for the negligent acts of medical care providers acting as independent contractors.

However, in Sword v. NKC Hospitals, Inc., the Indiana Supreme Court recognized apparent agency as an exception to this general rule.

Recently, the Indiana Court of Appeals expanded the breadth of the Sword doctrine in Jernagan v. Indiana University Health.

When you have professional liability insurance coverage through Alta Pro Insurance, you’ll have the claims repair and legal defense experts of Reminger Law on your side. Want to have a resource like that in your practice? Here’s how to get it.

Jernagan v. Indiana University Health

When Mr. Jernagan presented to IU Health for spinal surgery, he was handed a business card for Dr. Michael Miller, the anesthesiologist who would be assisting during the procedure, but he was not formally informed that Dr. Miller was an independent contractor.

However, the business card included the name and logo of Dr. Miller’s employer, Anesthesia Consultants of Indianapolis. During surgery, Mr. Jernagan experienced cardiac arrest and subsequently filed a malpractice claim. Initially, Mr. Jernagan filed his Proposed Complaint with the Indiana Department of Insurance (IDOI) against IU Health, the surgeon, and the incorrect anesthesiologist. The Medical Review Panel found in favor of IU Health and the surgeon without addressing the care of Dr. Miller or the incorrect anesthesiologist. Regardless, Mr. Jernagan filed a complaint against IU Health and argued that IU Health was vicariously liable for the acts of Dr. Miller under Sword.

Overturning the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to IU Health and thereby broadening the scope of Sword, the Indiana Court of Appeals held that Dr. Miller’s business card “merely indicates an affinity relationship” and “a sole business card, handed without more to an undoubtedly already anxious patient at check-in, [does not] conclusively affirm] that Dr. Miller was not an employee of IU Health or that the practice group was is employer.”

Equally problematic is the Court’s holding that apparent agency arguments fall outside the purview of the Medical Review Panel. The Court held that it was inconsequential that Dr. Miller was not named and his care was not assessed before the Panel because an assessment of Dr. Miller’s care by the Panel would not affect the determination of whether IU Health would be vicariously liable if Dr. Miller was found to have acted negligently.

Thus, under the Court’s holding, if an issue of fact is created, a plaintiff can escape the Medical Review Panel process for apparent agency arguments.

Ultimately, the Court’s holding makes it more difficult for hospitals to obtain summary judgment on apparent agency claims. Thus, in order to avoid issues of fact, it is imperative that medical providers acting as independent contractors routinely speak directly with patients to tell them that he or she is not an employee of the hospital and provide written confirmation of the same. This can happen at the same time informed consent is obtained but should be on a separate form. Moreover, the Court’s holding stresses the importance of hospitals entering and enforcing indemnity agreements with independent contractors.

If you would like a full copy of the opinion or if you have any other questions related to health care liability, please contact a member of our firm’s Medical Malpractice or Long-Term Care Liability Practice Groups.

About the Authors

Trenton Gill practices in Reminger Co., LPA’s Indianapolis office, and maintains a busy and diverse practice focusing on civil defense litigation. He represents physicians, dentists, chiropractors, and attorneys in professional liability claims matters. Having tried multiple jury trials, Trent has been responsible for civil cases from inception through conclusion, including appeals.

Trent counsels clients on a variety of legal issues including labor and employment, insurance coverage, contract creation and negotiation, worker’s compensation and risk management.

Autumn Seib practices in Reminger Co. LPA’s Indianapolis office, focusing on all types of civil defense matters with special interest in general liability, retail and hospitality liability, professional liability, commercial transportation, and medical malpractice defense. Autumn originally joined Reminger in 2018 as a law clerk, where she gained invaluable experience assisting with various stages of litigation.

This has been prepared for informational purposes only. It does not contain legal advice or legal opinion and should not be relied upon for individual situations. Nothing herein creates an attorney-client relationship between the Reader and Reminger. The information in this document is subject to change and the Reader should not rely on the statements in this document without first consulting legal counsel.

Share the Post:

Related Posts

Get with the RPG program!

Join our mail list. Free, cutting-edge CLE webinars on hot topics from Cannabis Law to Emerging Cyber Threats.